01486pab a2200193 454500008004000000100001700040245007700057260000900134300001300143362000800156520091500164650001501079650002001094700001301114773003401127909001001161999001701171952010401188180718b2000   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aRode, Catrin  aRisk-sensitive decision making examined within an evolutionary framework  c2000  ap.926-39  aMar  aTwo examples of human decision-making biases are reexamined from an evolutionary perspective. The framing effect and ambiguity avoidance effect both violate core assumptions of normative models of rational decision making. These violations were often used to showcase that the human mind is predisposed against optimal decision making. The authors argue that the human mind is fine-tuned to solve complex decision tasks that had been recurrent in hominid evolution. By studying the biases within the framework of risk-sensitivity theory, they demonstrate that humans take into account the mean outcome of an option, the variability of the outcome, and their current goal to arrive at a decision that is most likely to guarantee survival. Thus, an evolutionary approach helps us reveal important features of human choice behavior and provides insights into the nature of human decision rationality. - Reproduced  aPsychology  aDecision making  aWang, Xt  aAmerican Behavioral Scientist  a44549  c44549d44549  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 43, Issue no: 6pAR44960r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR