<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01792pab a2200169 454500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="008">180718b2000   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ncholo, Paseka</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Reforming the public service in South Africa: a policy framework</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2000</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">p.87-102</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="362" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">May</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This paper examines the measures taken to reform a state bureaucracy that was orientated to the needs of the white minority and which was the backbone of the apartheid system. This was a state, which in addition to its inherently racist nature, was structured according to closed models of public and development management. It was thus characterised by outdated management practices, corruption and mismanagement of resources. This article highlights the steps taken to create a more representative and legitimate public service and one that is reflective of the demographic composition of the majority. The second challenge has been to reform outdated management systems and practices and to ensure improved service delivery and accountability. The achievements of integrating the ethnically fragmented public service and in promoting a more representative bureaucracy and the promotion of a more transparent form of administration are highlighted in the Paper. However, this process has not always run smoothly. The author was a chairperson of a departmental investigation into the operations of provincial governments which uncovered extensive evidence of administrative malpractice, poor delegation and co-ordination as well as delegation of the employment of large numbers of supernumeracies and `ghost workers'. - Reproduced</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Civil service - South Africa</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Administrative reform</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Public Administration and Development</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="909" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">45355</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">45355</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">45355</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2018-07-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">Volume no: 20, Issue no: 2</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR45777</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2018-07-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2018-07-19</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
