01190pab a2200205 454500008004000000100001600040245002600056260000900082300001500091362001100106520062800117650001800745650002700763650000900790650001900799773003400818909001000852999001700862952010500879180718b2000   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aSathe, S.P.  aSupreme court and NBA  c2000  ap.3990-994  a11 Nov  aBy taking a very formal view of issues like rehabilitation and environment, the Supreme Court, in the Sardar Sarovar case, seems unfortunately to be suggesting its withdrawal from the larger role which it had assumed in recent decades. This is cause for concern because through judicial activism the court has played the role of legitimising and channelling various movements for social change and social justice. The dissenting judgment of Justice Bharucha, however, encourages hope that the trend of going back to the narrow legalistic paradigm of the judicial process will not be shared by the entire court. - Reproduced  aSupreme court  aNarmada Bachao Andolan  aDams  aRehabilitation  aEconomic and Political Weekly  a46708  c46708d46708  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 35, Issue no: 46pAR47136r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR