<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Getting the scale right: a comparison of analytical methods for vulnerability assessment and household level targeting</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Stephen, Linda</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Downing, Thomas E.</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xu|</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <dateIssued>2001</dateIssued>
    <issuance>continuing</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">ng </languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <extent>p.113-35</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>This paper introduces broad concepts of vulnerability, food security and famine.  It argues that the concepts and theories driving development and implementation of vulnerability assessment tools are related to their utility.  The review concludes that socio-geographic scale is a key issue, and challenge.  It analyses three vulnerability assessment (VA) methods, using Ethiopia as a case study.  Facing the challenges of vulnerability assessment and early warning requires providing accurate information at the required scale, useful for multiple decision-makers within realistic institutional capacities. - Reproduced</abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Food supply</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Disasters</namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">180718</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
