01612nam a2200181Ia 4500008004100000100002600041245009400067260000900161300001500170504000800185520100000193650001501193650002401208773005101232906001501283999001901298952011301317181130s2018    xx            000 0 und d  aKotchegura, Alexander  aPreventing corruption risk in legislation:bevidence from Russia, Moldova, and Kazakhstan  c2018  ap.377-387.  dApr  aCorruption risk assessment of draft laws and other normative acts is a relatively new instrument in the anti-corruption strategies implemented by developed nations, countries in transition, and the developing world. In connection with this, any practical experience accumulated in this area presents obvious interest. The analysis of such experience may allow to identify what works and what does not work in introducing the practices of anti-corruption screening of draft laws and other normative acts in various environments and settings, as well as contribute to dissemination of best practices in the countries of the region and elsewhere.  This article seeks to analyze and demonstrate the extent of practical implementation of corruption risk assessment of draft and enacted legislation in three post-communist countries, the problems encountered and solutions identified. Proceeding from this analysis, certain recommendations for practitioners in this field are formulated. - Reproduced.  aCorruption  aCorruption - Russia  aInternational Journal of Public Administration  aCorruption  c506880d506880  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-12-07h41(5 and 6), Apr, 2018: p.377-387.pAR118675r2018-12-07w2018-12-07yAR