01365nam a2200193Ia 4500008004100000100001600041245004100057260000900098300001500107504000800122520078900130650002500919650001900944650002600963773003800989906001901027999001901046952010601065181130s2018    xx            000 0 und d  aDuijf, Hein  aResponsibility voids and cooperation  c2018  ap.434-460.  dJul  aDo responsibility voids exist? That is, are there situations in which the group is collectively morally responsible for some outcome although no member can be held individually morally responsible for it? To answer these questions, I draw a distinction between competitive and cooperative decision contexts based on the team-reasoning account of cooperation. Accordingly, I provide a reasoning-based analysis of cooperation, competition, moral responsibility, and, last, potential responsibility voids. I then argue that competitive decision contexts are free of responsibility voids. The conditions for the existence of responsibility voids in cooperative decision contexts depend on the type of uncertainty the group faces, either external or coordination uncertainty. - Reproduced.  aMoral responsibility  aResponsibility  aSocial responsibility  aPhilosophy of the Social Sciences  aResponsibility  c506991d506991  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-12-07h48(4),Jul, 2018: p.434-460.pAR117877r2018-12-07w2018-12-07yAR