Fuller, Steve <br/><br/>
The path taken and not taken in social epistemology 

 -  2018 
 - p.530-536. 
<br/><br/> I respond to William Lynch’s critique of the sympathetic reading of my work provided by Remedios and Dusek in Knowing Humanity in the Social World: The Path of Steve Fuller’s Social Epistemology. Lynch harks back to my early works, which he sees as a promoting a ‘naturalism’ lacking in the later works. In response, I observe that my commitment to naturalism has always been ‘reflexive’, which has led me to break with conventional forms of naturalism, though sticking closely to the spirit of science. - Reproduced. 
<br/><br/><label>Subjects--Topical Terms: </label><br/>Epistemology