01842nam a2200181   4500999001900000008004100019100003000060245011100090260000900201300001500210520118200225700003401407700002701441773005201468906002001520942001201540952010801552  c509413d509413190507b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aSancino, Alessandro95192  aBetween patronage and good governance: Organizational arrangements in (local) public appointment processes  c2018  ap.785-802.  aThis article investigates whether certain organizational arrangements in (local) public appointment processes could encourage the use of appointments as a tool of good governance rather than as a tool of patronage. Specifically, we studied the role of six organizational arrangements in 10 case studies of intra- and inter-organizational public appointment processes held in Italian local government. We found that good governance (in terms of perception of overall integrity and fairness) was found in processes of public appointments where there was independent scrutiny, and when the process involved local councillors and/or external stakeholders – that is, actors beyond those with the formal power to appoint. In these cases, making appointments was seen as a tool of good governance rather than of patronage. These organizational arrangements were more relevant than other ones such as the transparency of public advertisements, job descriptions and educational/professional requirements, and media and public awareness. The article describes the relevant literature and the research study, and discusses implications for research, policy and management. - Reproduced.  aSicilia, Mariafrancesca95193  aGrossi, Giuseppe95194  aInternational Review of Administrative Sciences  aGood governance  2ddccAR  00102ddc40709383357aIIPAbIIPAd2019-05-07h84(4), Dec, 2018: p.785-802.pAR119591r2019-05-07yAR