01468nam a2200181   4500999001900000008004100019100003600060245011000096260000900206300001500215520081400230650002801044650003101072773003301103906002601136942001201162952011201174  c509533d509533190513b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aBelardinelli, Paolo et al95488  aFraming effects under different uses of performance information: an experimental study on public managers  c2018  ap.841-851.  aCombining insights from public administration, accounting, and psychology, this article explores the microprocesses by which public managers use performance information, investigating whether the type of performance information use and the request to justify decisions affect the way in which information is processed. The study draws on data from a series of artifactual survey experiments with Italian municipal executives. Findings show that managers process information differently under ex post rather than ex ante performance information uses. More specifically, managers are more likely to be subject to framing bias under ex post than under ex ante uses of performance information. This interaction seems to be robust when subjects are asked to provide justification for their decisions. - Reproduced.  aPublic management95489  aPerformance apprisal95490  aPublic Administration Review  aPublic administration  2ddccAR  00102ddc40709383473aIIPAbIIPAd2019-05-13h78(6), Nov/Dec, 2018: p.841-851.pAR119693r2019-05-13yAR