<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01612nam a2200181   4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">509580</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">509580</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">190515b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Davidescu, Simona</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">5599</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Two steps forward, one step back: renewable energy transitions in Bulgaria and Romania</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">2018</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">p.611-625.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This article examines renewable energy policy in Bulgaria and Romania (2007&#x2013;17) and the reasons behind the unexpected rapid growth in renewables followed by a policy reversal. While we find strong formal compliance with EU legislation regarding targets for renewable energy, an examination of institutional change and policy dismantling in both countries finds that this was not supported by a paradigmatic policy change or a transformation of the energy system. Veto players worked to dismantle renewable energy policy once targets were reached. We use insights from the intersection of socio&#x2010;technical systems and historical institutionalist literatures to explain policy dismantling in the energy sector. In doing so, we develop a socio&#x2010;technical account of renewable policy in Romania and Bulgaria. We show that this is related to the historically conditioned, path&#x2010;dependent processes of institutional change, where energy materiality shapes the parameters of political possibility and the costs of policy implementation. - Reproduced.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Renewable energy  sources - Romania</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">5600</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hiteva, Ralitsa</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">5601</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Maltby, Tomas</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">5602</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Public Administration</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Renewable energy sources - Bulgaria</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">383518</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2019-05-15</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">96(3), 2018: p.611-625.</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR119733</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2019-05-15</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
