01344nam a2200193   4500999001900000008004100019100002700060245005700087260000900144300001500153520073900168650002600907650001900933650002400952773003800976906001601014942001201030952010801042  c510557d510557190823b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aBrannmark, Johan98759  aInstitutions, ideology, and nonideal social ontology  c2019  ap.137-159.  aAnalytic social ontology has been dominated by approaches where institutions tend to come out paradigmatically as being relatively harmonious and mutually beneficial. This can however raise worries about such models potentially playing an ideological role in conceptualizing certain politically charged features of our societies as marginal phenomena or not even being institutional matters at all. This article seeks to develop a nonideal theory of institutions, which neither assumes that institutions are beneficial or oppressive, and where ideology is understood as a structuring and stabilizing phenomenon that helps maintain specific distributions of rights and duties by conferring perceived legitimacy onto them. - Reproduced.  aSocial ontology98760  aIdeology98761  aEpistemology 98762  aPhilosophy of the Social Sciences  aInstitution  2ddccAR  00102ddc40709384486aIIPAbIIPAd2019-08-23h49(2), Mar, 2019: p.137-159.pAR120477r2019-08-23yAR