01530pab a2200169 454500008004000000100002300040245010300063260000900166300001500175362000800190520097200198650002501170773003401195909001001229999001701239952010401256180718b2001   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aLieberman, Evan S.  aCasual inference in historical institutional analysis: a specification of periodization strategies  c2001  ap.1011-035  aNov  aAlthough emerging streams of historical institutional(HI) ananalysis have generated substantial insights in the field of comparative politics, has lacked a self conscious approach to methodology. This article specifies the comparative historical methods that may HI scholars have implictly used for estimating the casual effect of political institutions on key policy and other political outcomes. It demonostrates how various periodization strategies are deployed to sort out the influence of a host of hypothesized and rival explanatory factors. In addition to explicating these methods, the article critically exmanies recents works of HI scholarship, highlighting the analytical leverage generated through studies that might ordinarily seem to suffer from the problem of small samples. More explicit deployment of these methjods would both improve the quality of HI analysis and make its findings more transparent for further evaluation and emulation.-Reproduced.  aHistorical monuments  aComparative Political Studies  a51116  c51116d51116  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 34, Issue no: 9pAR51544r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR