<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01722nam a2200169   4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">512180</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">512180</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">191113b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Porter, Antonia </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">13103</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Prosecuting domestic abuse in England and Wales: Crown prosecution service 'Working practice' and new public managerialism </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">Social and Legal Studies</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">28(4), Aug, 2019: p.493-516.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) regards offences of domestic abuse as &#x2018;particularly serious&#x2019; and considers tackling violence against women a &#x2018;priority&#x2019;. This article examines how criminal prosecutors in England and Wales approach cases of intimate partner abuse in practice, specifically at the point when a complainant no longer wishes to support the prosecution. It first introduces &#x2018;New Public Managerialism&#x2019; (NPM). This is the lens through which the qualitative responses of a sample of nine prosecutors are thematically analysed. Second, the primary research indicates a prosecutorial tendency or &#x2018;working practice&#x2019; in 2017 disinclined to terminate cases on request, prompting instead the routine or habitual use of &#x2018;witness summons&#x2019;. Third, the article exposes how techniques of NPM have contributed to the identified &#x2018;working practice&#x2019;, often in concealed and unintended ways. Managerial priorities in this context appear to have restricted the free exercise of the prosecutor&#x2019;s discretion to take decisions on a case-by-case basis. The implications for women&#x2019;s safety and autonomy are considered. - Reproduced.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Abuse</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">13104</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Crown Prosecution Service </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">13105</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Social and Legal Studies</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Domestic violence </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">386249</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2019-11-13</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">28(4), Aug, 2019: p.493-516.</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR121589</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2019-11-13</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
