01829nam a22001217a 4500008004100000100001500041245013400056260002900190300003200219520134700251650008001598773002901678200918b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aChang, Y.   aUnequal social protection under the federalist system: three unemployment insurance approaches in the United States, 2007–2015.  aJournal of Social Policy  a49(1), Jan 2020. p. 189-211  aDespite the increased attention paid to federal-state unemployment insurance (UI) schemes after the Great Recession (2007–2009), research examining the policy characteristics and the underlying logic shaping the social protection provided by a federal-state UI system is limited. Integrating the perspectives of policy design theory, comparative welfare politics, and fiscal welfare, this paper examines the unequal social protection under the American UI system during and after the Great Recession. By using model-based cluster analysis and fixed-effect panel regression models, this paper identifies three distinct UI approaches, i.e. the limited social protection approach, the unbalanced social protection approach, and the balanced social protection approach. The policy choices made by those states that follow the three approaches reflect different mixtures of policy logic, including social protection, economic stabilization, work disincentives, and interstate competition. The overall downward trend in social protection signals that the American UI system is under-prepared for the next economic recession, thereby exposing unemployed workers to the risk of economic insecurity. These findings provide implications for future policy designs aiming to strengthen the social protection of the federal-state UI system. - Reproduced  aFederal-state unemployment insurance, Federal-state relations, Unemployment  aJournal of Social Policy