01381nam a22001217a 4500008004100000100004600041245012000087260001800207300003300225520089500258650008801153773001801241201120b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aHjorth, Thomas Lopdrup and Gay, Paul Du.   aSpeaking truth to power? Anti-bureaucratic romanticism from critical organizational theorizing to the White House    aOrganization   a 27(3), May, 2020: p.441-453  aIn spite of their distinctive normative and political differences, critical organizational scholars use a vocabulary which in several respects resembles that adopted by right-wing populists. This vocabulary, we argue, consists of components that can be deployed in the pursuit of radically conflicting goals. At its heart lies a profoundly antithetical stance toward bureaucracy and the state. In this article, we explore the components of this vocabulary as well as the role they play in both populist- and critical organizational theory-variants. In doing so, we further discuss the lack of critical potential this vocabulary has in the present. For critical organization scholars, we argue, this should perhaps lead to a renewed consideration and reflexivity concerning not only the merits of bureaucracy and the state, but also of how to conduct critique in populist times.- Reproduced   a Anti-bureaucracy, Bureaucracy, CMS, Critique, Organization theory, Populism, Trump  aOrganization