01162nam a22001217a 4500008004100000100002600041245004300067260003900110300003300149520073600182650008300918773003901001201212b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aFumagalli , Roberto.   aOn the individuation of choice options  aPhilosophy of The Social Sciences   a 50(4), Jul, 2020: p,338-365  aDecision theorists have attempted to accommodate several violations of decision theory’s axiomatic requirements by modifying how agents’ choice options are individuated and formally represented. In recent years, prominent authors have worried that these modifications threaten to trivialize decision theory, make the theory unfalsifiable, impose overdemanding requirements on decision theorists, and hamper decision theory’s internal coherence. In this paper, I draw on leading descriptive and normative works in contemporary decision theory to address these prominent concerns. In doing so, I articulate and assess several different criteria for individuating and formally representing agents’ choice options.- Reproduced   aDecision theory, Rationality, Axioms, Preferences, Consistency, Choice options  aPhilosophy of The Social Sciences