01378nam a22001697a 4500999001900000008004100019100003300060245004300093260003900136300003300175520073600208650009000944773003901034906002001073942000701093952010801100  c514768d514768201212b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aFumagalli , Roberto. 921706  aOn the individuation of choice options  aPhilosophy of The Social Sciences   a 50(4), Jul, 2020: p,338-365  aDecision theorists have attempted to accommodate several violations of decision theory’s axiomatic requirements by modifying how agents’ choice options are individuated and formally represented. In recent years, prominent authors have worried that these modifications threaten to trivialize decision theory, make the theory unfalsifiable, impose overdemanding requirements on decision theorists, and hamper decision theory’s internal coherence. In this paper, I draw on leading descriptive and normative works in contemporary decision theory to address these prominent concerns. In doing so, I articulate and assess several different criteria for individuating and formally representing agents’ choice options.- Reproduced   aDecision theory, Rationality, Axioms, Preferences, Consistency, Choice options919620  aPhilosophy of The Social Sciences   aDECISION THEORY  cAR  00102ddc40709388780aIIPAbIIPAd2020-12-12h 50(4), Jul, 2020: p,338-365pAR123645r2020-12-12yAR