<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01100nam a22001457a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">514924</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">514924</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210102b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Shandra, J.M., Restivo M. and Sommer, J.M. </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">22024</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Appetite for destructions? China, Ecologically unequal exchange, and forest loss*</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rural Sociology </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">85(2), Jun, 2020: p.346-375</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">We test the hypothesis from the theory of ecologically unequal exchange that agricultural exports to China are related to increased forest loss in low&#x2010; and middle&#x2010;income nations exporting to it. We do so by analyzing data for 75 low&#x2010; and middle&#x2010;income nations using ordinary least squares regression. We find support for our hypothesis that flows of agricultural exports from low&#x2010; and middle&#x2010;income nations to China are related to increased forest loss in exporting nations. We also find that a country's total agricultural exports, proximity of forest to infrastructure, and protected areas tend to increase forest loss. - Reproduced </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Rural Sociology </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ECOLOGY - CHINA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">388937</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2021-01-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">85(2), Jun, 2020: p.346-375</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR123793</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2021-01-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
