01501nam a22001577a 4500999001900000008004100019100003000060245010000090260001500190300003600205520095200241773001501193906001701208942000701225952011101232  c515710d515710210204b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aTannenwald, Nina. 924102  aLife beyoung arms control: Moving toward a global regime of nuclear restraint & responsibility   aDaedalus    a149(2), Spring, 2020: p.205-221  aToday, we are on the verge of a world without nuclear restraint. In the absence of formal arms control, how do we proceed? What broad principles and norms would we want? What measures might nuclear-armed states take, even without formal agreement, that would reduce the risk of nuclear war and control the arms race? I suggest that nuclear-armed states move toward a global regime of nuclear restraint and responsibility. Restraint would primarily take the form of reciprocal commitments and unilateral measures to avoid an arms race and reduce nuclear dangers. Responsibility refers to the fact that nuclear-armed states must pursue limited forms of deterrence and are accountable to the international community. I suggest several steps that governments, with the help of civil society, could take, beginning with the most minimal, declaratory initiatives and unilateral measures, and proceeding to steps that require more action. – Reproduced   aDaedalus    aARMS CONTROL  cAR  00102ddc40709389785aIIPAbIIPAd2021-02-04h149(2), Spring, 2020: p.205-221pAR124073r2021-02-04yAR