01587nam a22001697a 4500999001900000008004100019100005200060245012100112260001900233300003200252520087600284650009201160773001801252906003301270942000701303952010701310  c516010d516010210212b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aNickels, A., Clark, A.D. and Wood, Z.D. 924224  aHow municipal takeovers reshape urban democracy: Comparing the experiences of camden, new jersey and flint, michigan  aUrban Affairs   a56(3), May, 2020: p.790-822  a Municipal takeovers are a state policy ostensibly designed to address urban fiscal crises by “temporarily” taking over local government, suspending local control, and implementing sweeping austerity measures. Although framed as “apolitical,” takeovers have the capacity to reshape local democracy. These changes radically rearrange how decisions are made, who has access to decision makers, and, ultimately, who is in power. Using a policy-centered approach, we compare the cases of Camden, New Jersey and Flint, Michigan, illustrating how variations in policy design and localized implementation reshaped the local political landscape in different ways. While the Camden takeover institutionalized the emergent “community development regime,” Flints’ grassroots activists and community-based organizations destabilized the emergent regime. – Reproduced   aMunicipal takeover, Local governance, Urban regime, Fiscal crisis, Policy design922294  aUrban Affairs  aMUNICIPAL GOVERNMENT - INDIA  cAR  00102ddc40709390121aIIPAbIIPAd2021-02-12h56(3), May, 2020: p.790-822pAR124303r2021-02-12yAR