<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01339nam a22001577a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">516654</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">516654</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">210310b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sinha, Adweetiya</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">25771</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Indian judiciary: A hornets&#x2019; nest</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bihar Journal of Public Administration  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">17(1), Jan-June, 2020: p.144-153</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">There are multiple problems in the three tier hierarchy of India&#x2019;s judicial system. The issues with other two organs of the government are highlighted and deliberated upon on public forums but the problems of Indian Judicial System are relegated to the background. The problem of judicial pendency in India is something we must reckon. Two issues of the Economic Survey have simultaneously focused on judicial pendency at length. The problem of judicial pendency is linked with judicial vacancies and several other problems like poor infrastructure, red-tapism etc. Apart from them judicial secrecy is also a matter of concern. India&#x2019;s ranking in the Rule of Law Index is continuously deteriorating. We must acknowledge all the problems before trying to find their plausible solutions. &#x2013; Reproduced </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Pendency of cases, Persisting-vacancy, Red Tapism, appointment, Rule of law</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">23208</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bihar Journal of Public Administration  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">JUDICIARY - INDIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">390703</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2021-03-10</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">17(1), Jan-June, 2020: p.144-153</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR124493</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2021-03-10</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
