01502nam a22001697a 4500999001900000008004100019100002600060245011000086260004500196300003800241520077500279650008901054773004701143906002201190942000701212952011301219  c517750d517750210727b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aYan, Bo et al 927983  aWhy do countries respond differently to Covid-19? A comparative study of Sweden, China, France, and Japan  aAmerican Review of Public Administration  a50(6-7), Aug-Oct, 2020: p.762-769  aNonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are important public health tools to fight against COVID-19. Governments around the world have instituted a variety of NPIs to modify individuals’ behavior, giving rise to four distinct pandemic response strategies: nudge, mandate, decree, and boost. To better understand the different policy choices involved in these strategies, four countries including Sweden, China, France, and Japan were compared to identify the critical institutional and cultural determinants of national response strategy. The finding shows that various responses regarding same threat are dependent on the distinctive institutional arrangements and cultural orientation of each country, and thus, there is no One-Size-Fits-All strategy. – Reproduced   aCOVID-19, Institutional arrangements, Cultural orientation, Response strategy925878  aAmerican Review of Public Administration    aCOVID 19 PANDEMIC  cAR  00102ddc40709391816aIIPAbIIPAd2021-07-27h50(6-7), Aug-Oct, 2020: p.762-769pAR124999r2021-07-27yAR