<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01625nam a22001577a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">519014</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">519014</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">220120b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ghose, Ajit K. and Kumar, Abhishek </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">31907</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">India&#x2019;s deepening employment crisis in the time of rapid economic growth</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Indian Journal of Labour Economics </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">64(2), Apr-Jun, 2021: p.247-279</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The employment conditions in India were steadily deteriorating in the 2000s. Agriculture not just stopped accommodating new workers but was increasingly rendering many of the already employed workers&#x2014;mostly less educated&#x2014;redundant. Meanwhile, non-agriculture was generating employment at an increasingly slower pace and was also generating it basically for the educated. So, it was failing to absorb the labour moving out of agriculture. Under these conditions, progressive exclusion of the less educated from employment and decelerating employment growth of the educated emerged as the main trends, which showed up in declining employment rate, rising unemployment rate and, ironically enough, steady improvement in the average quality of employment. All this was happening in a period of rapid economic growth. The proximate explanation is that growth was less rapid than the skill-biased technological change that was associated with it. The deeper reason is that the benefits of growth accrued to a thin top layer of the population&#x2014;the rich. &#x2013; Reproduced </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Employment, Skill-bias, Economic growth, Inequality</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">29156</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Indian Journal of Labour Economics </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">EMPLOYMENT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">393067</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2022-01-20</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">64(2), Apr-Jun, 2021: p.247-279</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR126056</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2022-01-20</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
