01552nam a22001697a 4500999001900000008004100019100002800060245010200088260003300190300003300223520088500256650008101141773003301222906001201255942000701267952010801274  c519135d519135220202b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aLiebig, Michael 932030  aInterrogating ‘hyphenated cultures’ India’s strategic culture and its intelligence culture   aJournal of Defense Studies    a15(3), Jul-Sep, 2021: p.9-40  aIn the late 1950s, the concept of 'political culture' was first developed. Towards the end of the Cold War, scholars in International Relations (IR) theory and security studies developed the concept of 'strategic culture'. Over a period, state bureaucracies were thematised by scholars of comparative politics leading to the concept of 'bureaucratic culture'. Lastly, in the second decade of the twenty-first century, a comparative turn in intelligence studies began to emerge with the concept of (national) 'intelligence culture'. Some of these concepts have not yet been in much use, nor have they been thoroughly theorised—some even less so empirically operationalised. This paper discusses the 'hyphenated' inter-relationship of these cultures and even explores the historical origins of India's intelligence culture, particularly in Kautilya's Arthashastra. – Reproduced   aStrategic culture, Intelligence culture, India’s strategic culture 929460  aJournal of Defense Studies    aCULTURE  cAR  00102ddc40709393184aIIPAbIIPAd2022-02-02h15(3), Jul-Sep, 2021: p.9-40pAR126173r2022-02-02yAR