01738nam a22001697a 4500999001900000008004100019100004800060245012800108260003100236300003200267520102600299650008201325773003101407906001601438942000701454952010701461  c520377d520377220912b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aRoland, D. Forder, J. and Jones, K. 933996  aState of the art what is out there and what can we learn? International evidence on funding and delivery of long-term care   aSocial Policy and Society   a21(2), Apr, 2022: p.261-274  aThis article describes the social care funding and delivery arrangements of a varied selection of developed countries, focusing on long-term care of older people. International evidence and latest reforms can inform the debate as countries struggle economically. Some have opted for mandatory social insurance that provides universal coverage. A premium is paid and if the insured individual or relatives require support, they are entitled to it. Others opted for a similar universal system but with earmarked taxation, while others fund their social care entirely from general taxation. Many chose a safety-net system in which benefits are means-tested leaving wealthier individuals to secure private arrangements of care. Within the UK, the level of support varies as Scotland provides personal care free of charge, being more generous than England, Wales and Northern Ireland. There is no “one solution”, but understanding different options can help in the discussion of current and future reforms. – Reproduced   aLong-term care, Social care, Funding, Delivery, Long-term care reform.932810  aSocial Policy and Society   aSOCIAL CARE  cAR  00102ddc40709394438aIIPAbIIPAd2022-09-12h21(2), Apr, 2022: p.261-274pAR126969r2022-09-12yAR