<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01227nam a22001577a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">522008</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">522008</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">230307b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Loganathan,  Muralidharan</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">38272</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Assessing social sustainability in the gig economy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Indian Journal of Labour Economics</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> 65(3), Jul-Sep, 2022: p. 831-843</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sustainable Development Goal 8 to &#x201C;Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all&#x201D; necessitates country level measures across the world. We take forward a comparative analysis of India&#x2019;s SDG 8 indicator list with both the UN and ILO measurements. We note inadequate measurements on social-protection and rights for non-standard forms of employment including gig work, that are intermediated by ICT platforms. From our analysis we identify some levers to broaden the current indicator measurements to include these non-standard workers as well, to improve social sustainability. &#x2013; Reproduced </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Non-standard employment, Gig work, Labour rights, Social sustainability, Indicators. </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">36627</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Indian Journal of Labour Economics</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">EMPLOYMENT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">396693</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2023-03-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">65(3), Jul-Sep, 2022: p. 831-843</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR128270</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2023-03-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
