01710nam a22001697a 4500999001900000008004100019100004700060245007300107260004500180300003700225520103600262650005601298773004501354906002201399942000701421952011201428  c522838d522838230607b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aGulati, Jivantika and Ranjan, Radha941442  aCascading role of governance in ensuring judicial activism in India   aBihar Journal of Public Administration    a19(25), Jul-Sep, 2022: p.146-156  aIt is crucial that all three branches of government work in unison if the country is to advance. But the situation today is worrying. The legislature and the executive either struggle to carry out their responsibilities with the utmost earnestness or try to dodge them. Therefore, the judiciary, the third organ, is the only one left to use judicial activism to address the complaints of the public. There has been activist approach by the judiciary especially for the disadvantaged or downtrodden sections of the society. It has delivered justice to the people keeping in its mind the limitations mentioned in our Indian Constitution. On the other hand, the judges may have crossed the line and forgotten what was acceptable. According to Montesquieu’s “separation of powers” philosophy, there should be no crossing of boundaries. However, the judicial inventiveness that hasn’t been focused on and used by the other machinery is what the public see and view as the judiciary overstepping the other organs. – Reproduced   aJudicial activism, Judiciary and Governance.938594  aBihar Journal of Public Administration    aJUDICIAL ACTIVISM  cAR  00102ddc40709397876aIIPAbIIPAd2023-06-07h19(25), Jul-Sep, 2022: p.146-156pAR128894r2023-06-07yAR