01683pab a2200181 454500008004000000100002000040245008900060260000900149300001400158362000800172520112300180650001801303650001501321773003401336909001001370999001701380952010401397180718b2002   xxu||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aHansen, Randall  aGlobalization, embedded realism, and path dependence: the other immigrants to Europe  c2002  ap.259-83.  aApr  aLong confined to historians and sociologists, the study of immigration has garnered increased interest among political scientists.  Two dominant schools - the globalization and embedded realist theses - have attempted to account for the gap between restrictionist intentions of governments and continuing immigation (the gap hypothesis).  The globalization thesis argues that international norms and institutions limit governments' ability to control migration; the embeded realist thesis counters that limits on state autonomy are domestic.  This article argues that although the embedded realist thesis is on stronger conceptual ground, both fail to account for two central categories of immigrants to Europe: colonial immigrants to France and Britain and asylum seekers to Germany.  Drawing on historical institutionalist work, this article employs a path-dependent analysis to account for these categories.  Against their own wishes, government found themselves accepting larger migrations and naturalizations because of the path-dependent effects of their own citizenship and constitutional regimes. - Reproduced.  aGlobalization  aImmigrants  aComparative Political Studies  a52330  c52330d52330  00104070aIIPAbIIPAd2018-07-19hVolume no: 35, Issue no: 3pAR52760r2018-07-19w2018-07-19yAR