<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Atoning for violent pasts: Assessing the promise and perils of political apologies</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Chatterjee, Kasturi</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Social Action</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>73(2), Apr-Jun, 2023: p.136-149</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Political apologies have become a significant means by which societies address their violent pasts. They are valued for their ability to rectify past wrongs, provide closure and engender hope for future reconciliation. Despite this, political apologies also draw criticism for being insincere, hypocritical and doing too little too late. This paper aims to examine political topologies along three key lines. The first part of the paper evaluates the essential elements of a successful apology, taking into account  its meaning classification and contact. – Reproduced </abstract>
  <subject>
    <topic>Political apology, Historical justice, Reconciliation, Reparation, Politics of regret</topic>
  </subject>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Social Action </namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">230927</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
