01631nam a22001697a 4500999001900000008004100019100003000060245006600090260004500156300003200201520103400233650002101267773004501288906001401333942000701347952010701354  c524674d524674240110b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aSane, Maithili S. 947979  aJudiciary as a bureaucratic organisation and its public value  aIndian Journal of Public Administration   a69(4), Dec, 2023: p.766-778  aIn 2021, India fell three positions in the Rule of Law Index released by the World Justice Project (2019). The India Justice Report 2020 shows the pathological disparity in access and administration of justice in India. Why is it that despite decades of judicial reforms, justice delivery in India continues to remain poor? This paper argues that judiciary is looked at and studied from the standpoint of its most visible dimension—judges and their decision-making, rather than the administrative machinery which facilitates this. This has tilted the judicial reforms discourse towards structures and procedures rather than functions and behaviours. Using the Public Value Theory, it is submitted that judiciary needs to be understood as a ‘bureaucratic’ and ‘public’ organisation which is not only tasked with justice delivery but also value creation. This is a novel approach which has not been deployed to study judicial organisations. – Reproduced 

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/00195561231196220
  aJudiciary947980  aIndian Journal of Public Administration   aJUDICIARY  cAR  00102ddc40709399727aIIPAbIIPAd2024-01-10h69(4), Dec, 2023: p.766-778pAR130500r2024-01-10yAR