<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02524nam a22001457a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">524702</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">524702</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">240111b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Banerjee, Kaushiki and Ghose,Arpita </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">48002</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Determinants of female labour force participation in urban India: Does outdoor air pollution matter?</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Indian Journal of Labour Economics  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">66(3), Jul-Sep, 2023: p.815-832</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The paper contributes the literature in the following ways: (a) It establishes negative sole impact of urban outdoor air-pollution and its interaction-effect with growth, poverty, and urbanisation on female life-expectancy (FLE), hence on female labour force participation rate (FLFPR); proving the positive two-way relation between these two through estimating a simultaneous panel-model comprising equations of FLFPR and FLE, for Indian-states over the period 2017&#x2013;2022. The significant impact of the interaction-effect shows partial-effect of a change in the concerned variable on FLE and on FLFPR depends on air-pollution. Thus, measures to raise growth, urbanisation or reduce poverty can improve FLE and FLFPR, provided air-pollution is mitigated. (b) Moreover, significant impact of interaction-effect of household-size and growth (Lnnsdp&#x2009;&#xD7;&#x2009;HHsz) on FLFPR is supported, i.e., the impact of growth on FLFPR depends on household-size and vice-versa. A critical-level of Lnnsdp&#x2009;&#xD7;&#x2009;HHsz exists; FLFPR increases/falls with Lnnsdp&#x2009;&#xD7;&#x2009;HHsz according as actual Lnnsdp&#x2009;&#xD7;&#x2009;HHsz is lesser/higher than critical-level. The higher sample-mean of Lnnsdp&#x2009;&#xD7;&#x2009;HHsz than critical-value implies FLFPR falls with both growth and household-size, i.e. given household-size, income-effect dominates and women value leisure more. It adds the earlier inverted-U feminisation hypothesis for India investigating only sole-impact of growth on FLFPR. (c) Further, the relationship between interaction-effect of female education and household-size (Hedu&#x2009;&#xD7;&#x2009;HHsz) on FLFPR is U-type, i.e., a critical level of Hedu&#x2009;&#xD7;&#x2009;HHsz exists, FLFPR falls/rises with Hedu&#x2009;&#xD7;&#x2009;HHsz according as actual Hedu&#x2009;&#xD7;&#x2009;HHsz is lesser/higher than critical-level. The lower sample-mean of Hedu&#x2009;&#xD7;&#x2009;HHsz than critical-value implies, FLFPR falls with education and household-size, i.e., female education does not necessarily imply higher FLFPR. &#x2013; Reproduced 

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41027-023-00451-8
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Indian Journal of Labour Economics  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">LABOURS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">399751</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-01-11</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">66(3), Jul-Sep, 2023: p.815-832</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR130521</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2024-01-11</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
