<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01652nam a22001577a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">524708</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">524708</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">240111b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dutta, Deborisha </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">48009</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Comprehending corporate criminal liability through the evolution of liability paradigm</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kashmir Journal of Legal Studies  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10(1), Jul, 2023: p.7-20</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The concept of attributing criminal liability to individuals has been always feasible but the challenge arose when collectivities had to be held criminally liable for their behaviour. The researcher believes that a comprehensive understanding of the criminal accountability of entities entails succin ct scrutiny of the subject matter over time. The paper would focus on the concept of liability and its various theories and characteristics in order to establish the importance of corporate criminal liability. The paper would also try to analyze what can be the correct liability approach that would endorse social justice by holding the corporate bodies guilty. The researcher in this context would try to establish the importance of vicarious liability and the doctrine of identification along with other newly evolved doctrines. The concept of knowledge and intent forms an integral part of the paper. The question that remains constant is that which liability model should be relied on to establish a uniform approach while deciding cases on corporate crime. &#x2013; Reproduced 

http://kashmirjournaloflegalstudies.edu.in/JWS/Default.aspx
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Corporate criminal liability</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">48010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kashmir Journal of Legal Studies  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">CRIMES</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">399757</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-01-11</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">10(1), Jul, 2023: p.7-20</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR130529</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2024-01-11</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
