<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02017nam a22001457a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">525023</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">525023</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">240207b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kumar, Sunny </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">48413</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Neeti Nair, hurt sentiments: Secularism and belonging in South Asia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Indian Economic and Social History Review  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">60(4), Oct-Dec, 2023: p.481-482</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Neeti Nair, Hurt Sentiments: Secularism and Belonging in South Asia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2023, 350 pp.
Politicians and political commentators have often been quick to argue that Western European notions of secularism cannot simply be superimposed on South Asia, but they have found it rather difficult to define their own South Asian version of it. For me, this difficulty owes more to the lack of intent than content. While scholars have paid due attention to how secularism in modern South Asia has continuously been under siege by its opponents, the vacillations and betrayals of its proponents have slipped under the radar. Neeti Nair&#x2019;s Hurt Sentiments is an important contribution in this regard, which brings the secularists to the centre of her study of the displacement of secularism as the paradigm of political discourse in South Asia in the twentieth century. Contrary to what the title implies, the politics of outrage against hurtful, offensive or &#x2018;blasphemous&#x2019; expressions are only a small but crucial part of this broader investigation. Nair undertakes a close reading of a few conjunctures in the history of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh, when secularism was passionately debated and key legislation was enacted. Taken together, these disparate discussions give critical insights into the ideology and practices of South Asian secularists and their role in the weakening of secularism as a political force in the region. &#x2013;Reproduced 

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/00194646231203727
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The Indian Economic and Social History Review  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">BOOK REVIEW </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">400069</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-02-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">60(4), Oct-Dec, 2023: p.481-482</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR130855</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2024-02-07</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
