02044nam a22001577a 4500999001900000008004100019100004800060245008200108260003600190300003400226520145100260773003601711906002301747942000701770952010901777  c525266d525266240220b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d  aMillner, Antony and  Heal, Geoffrey 949999  aChoosing the future: Markets, ethics, and rapprochement in social discounting  aJournal of Economic Literature   a61(3), Sep, 2023: p.1037-1087  aThis paper provides a critical review of the literature on choosing social discount rates (SDRs) for public cost-benefit analysis. We discuss two dominant approaches, the first based on market prices and the second based on intertemporal ethics. While both methods have attractive features, neither is immune to criticism. The market-based approach is not entirely persuasive even if markets are perfect, and faces further headwinds once the implications of market imperfections are recognised. By contrast, the 'ethical' approach—which relates SDRs to marginal rates of substitution implicit in a single planner's intertemporal welfare function—does not rely exclusively on markets, but raises difficult questions about what that welfare function should be. There is considerable disagreement on this matter, which translates into enormous variation in the evaluation of long-run payoffs. We discuss the origins of these disagreements, and suggest that they are difficult to resolve unequivocally. This leads us to propose a third approach that recognises the immutable nature of some normative disagreements, and proposes methods for aggregating diverse theories of intertemporal social welfare. We illustrate the application of these methods to social discounting, and suggest that they may help us to move beyond long-standing debates that have bedevilled this field.- Reproduced 

https://www.aeaweb.org/articles?id=10.1257/jel.20211675
  aJournal of Economic Literature   aSOCIAL DISCOUNTING  cAR  00102ddc40709400322aIIPAbIIPAd2024-02-20h61(3), Sep, 2023: p.1037-1087pAR131073r2024-02-20yAR