<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02182nam a22001577a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">525578</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">525578</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">240322b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Luiz, John M. and  Terziev,Viktor </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">50784</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Axes and fluidity of oppression in the workplace: Intersectionality of race, gender, and sexuality</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Organization  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">31(2), Mar, 2024: p.295-315</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Our research explores how the historically institutionalized and authoritarian discriminatory South African context continues to affect the experiences of LGBT mid-level managers in the workplace. South Africa provides a rich environment to explore &#x201C;axes of oppression&#x201D; (heteronormativity/homophobia, race/racism, gender/sexism), and how these manifest and impact on participants&#x2019; work experience. Bringing together intersectionality as an analytical strategy with identity work allows us to examine the interaction between identities and the institutionalized processes by which they are shaped. Our findings show a multifaceted fluidity of oppression where individuals can move between continuums of advantage and disadvantage. We demonstrate the importance of historically embedded modes of oppression within the theory of intersectionality and how this manifests in institutional and organizational practices. As a result, organizations, institutions, and individuals play a role in reproducing inequality through intricate systems of oppression at micro, meso, and macro levels. This affects how individuals draw on their intersecting identities to respond to and decipher encounters with others.- Reproduced 

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/13505084221098252
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">South African context  LGBT mid-level managers  Workplace experiences  Axes of oppression  Heteronormativity  Homophobia  Race/Racism  Gender/Sexism  Intersectionality  Identity work  Institutionalized processes  Continuums of advantage and disadvantage  Historically embedded modes of oppression  Institutional and organizational practices  Systems of oppression  Micro, meso, and macro levels  Intersecting identities</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">50785</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Organization  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="906" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">GENDERS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">400637</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2024-03-22</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">31(2), Mar, 2024: p.295-315</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR131378</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2024-03-22</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
