<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01623nam a22001457a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">530968</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">530968</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250722b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ramos, Juan Ruiz </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">55518</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Let me move: A legal analysis of residence restrictions on asylum-seekers in Ceuta, Melilla and the canary Islands</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Social &amp; Legal Studies </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">34(3), Jun, 2025: p.421-438</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">For over a decade, Spanish police have prevented asylum-seekers in Ceuta and Melilla&#x2014;two Spanish exclaves in Northern Africa&#x2014;from moving to mainland Spain. Since 2020, similar measures have been taken in the Canary Islands. However, this practice has not taken place in a vacuum. This article shows that the Spanish authorities have long drafted and interpreted Spanish law in such a way as to create a veil of legality over these residence restrictions. Moreover, they have ignored attempts by the courts to uphold the freedom of asylum-seekers to choose their place of residence within the borders of the State. The government and the police have thus exercised a kind of &#x201C;diluted&#x201D; legal social control, in which legal certainty and human rights safeguards are out of the picture. This article analyzes the issue from different perspectives, using social control theories, classical legal doctrinal analysis, and comparisons with criminal law.- Reproduced 

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/09646639231226227
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Asylum-seekers, Right to choose one&#x2019;s residence, right to free movement, Social control, Legal control, Refugee rights. </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">55519</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Social &amp; Legal Studies </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">406167</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-07-22</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">34(3), Jun, 2025: p.421-438</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR136688</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-07-22</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
