<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01601nam a22001457a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">532057</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">532057</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">251202b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Gavey, Nicola </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">58073</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Deconstructing &#x2018;rough sex&#x2019; in a new Zealand murder trial: Beyond the modern mythology of everyday kink</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Social and Legal Studies  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">34(6), Dec, 2025: p.896-917</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">I analyse the way &#x2018;rough sex&#x2019;, including &#x2018;choking&#x2019;, was normalised during the 2019 trial of Jesse Kempson for the murder of Grace Millane &#x2013; and portrayed as a modern form of mutual and egalitarian sexual exploration, particularly for young people. While the so-called &#x2018;rough sex defence&#x2019; has been widely critiqued for the way it operates in the criminal justice system to minimise violence against women and blame victims for their own murder or assault, I focus here on the wider social implications of such legal arguments. I identify how the trial was infused with a &#x2018;modern mythology of everyday kink&#x2019; discourse, which I critically deconstruct through the lens of three women's stories about unwanted or unenjoyed &#x2018;rough sex&#x2019;. I show that this discourse obscures and enables concerning new patterns of hurtful, exploitative and violent acts against women and girls that are becoming normalised and legitimated in the name of (rough) sex.- Reproduced 

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/09646639241292689
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Violence against women, Expert evidence, Sex positivity, Sexual choking, Sexual consent, BDSM. </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">58074</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Social and Legal Studies  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">407245</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-12-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">34(6), Dec, 2025: p.896-917</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR137697</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-12-02</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
