<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Criss-crossing theory, history and method: New measures of reflexivity</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Hegde, Sasheej</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Social Scientist</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>53(7-8), Jul-Aug, 2025: p.23-46</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>But if someone were to say so logic too is an empirical science he world wrong. Yet this is right the same proposition may get treated at one time as something to test by experience at another as a rule of lasting. – Reproduced </abstract>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Social Scientist  </namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">251216</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
