<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01496nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">533128</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">533128</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260427b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mahadevia, Darshini and Sharma, Rutool</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">60240</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">To plan or not to plan?: The conundrum for sustainable urbanisation in India</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> 61(6), Feb 7, 2026: p.49-52</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Urban planning is essential for sustainable urbanisation. Its practice in India has often translated into legitimising exclusions, deepening inequality, and declining ecological resources. Based on our reading of the objectives stated in the spatial plans prepared over time for six Indian cities&#x2014;Delhi, Mumbai, Ahmedabad, Bengaluru, Jaipur, and Kolkata&#x2014;we find, responding to broad development ideas of the period, two broad themes around which the plans&#x2019; key contents are organised. These themes are: (i) anti-urban utopianism represented through the ideas of decongestion, decentralisation, and deindustrialisation, and social-democracy framework (labelled as socialist phase in India); and (ii) market-led planning. Both have created exclusions, creating a false dichotomy of state versus market in urban planning in India. Thus, the conundrum lies not merely in whether to plan or not, but also in how planning can foster sustainable and inclusive urban futures.-Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/review-urban-affairs/plan-or-not-plan.html
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">408300</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-04-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="h"> 61(6), Feb 7, 2026: p.49-52</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR138639</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-04-27</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
