<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01153nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">533177</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">533177</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260428b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Hossain, Babul</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">60294</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Ageing with absent family financial support: Gendered health risks across the North South gradient</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">61(9), Feb 28, 2026: p.79-84</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Family-based financial support has traditionally been central to old-age care in India. Given the gendered and spatial experiences of ageing, it is important to identify groups of older adults who are more vulnerable to adverse health outcomes when such financial support is absent. Utilising the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India, this paper finds that widowed, poor, and SC/ST or OBC women represented the most common intersectional positionality among older adults who faced a particularly high risk of adverse health outcomes when faced with a lack of informal financial support. &#x2013;Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/9/ageing-health-and-social-security/ageing-absent-family-financial-support.html
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">408348</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-04-28</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">61(9), Feb 28, 2026: p.79-84</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR138689</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-04-28</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
