<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01138nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">533199</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">533199</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260429b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Srivastava, S.C.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">60316</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Normative and constitutional challenges in defining &#x2018;wages&#x2019; under the code on wages, 2019</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">61(11), Mar 14, 2026: p.29-32</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The normative ambiguities embedded in the definition of &#x201C;wages&#x201D; under the Code on Wages, 2019 are examined with particular reference to the first proviso to Section 2(y). While the definitional framework seeks uniformity across labour codes, it introduces a problematic classification that lacks a clear rational basis and may result in unequal access to statutory benefits among similarly placed employees. This classification raises concerns of constitutional equality under Article 14 and creates compliance uncertainties for employers by imposing additional regulatory burdens.-Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/11/perspectives/normative-and-constitutional-challenges-defining.html
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">408370</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-04-29</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">61(11), Mar 14, 2026: p.29-32</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR138711</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-04-29</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
