<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Tax mobilisation strategies: Union budget 2026–27</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart> Athira, A. and   Ramesh, Vishnu K.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Economic &amp; Political Weekly</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>61(14), Apr 4, 2026: p.67-71</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Despite steady growth in gross tax revenues, the tax to GDP ratio has remained largely stagnant. The composition of tax revenue has shifted towards direct taxes, indicating a gradual move towards a more progressive system. Key reforms in direct and indirect taxation, including corporate tax rationalisation, changes in share buyback taxation, expansion of the personal income tax regime, measures to simplify GST and customs procedures through greater digitalisation, and specifically the Income Tax Act, 2025 improve efficiency, structural challenges persist. These include a narrow tax base and limited tax buoyancy, requiring continued reforms in tax design and administration.-Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/14/budget-2026-27/tax-mobilisation-strategies.html
</abstract>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Economic &amp; Political Weekly  </namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">260430</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
