<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00814nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">533370</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">533370</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260518b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kumar, Vivek and Babu, R. Rajesh </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">60639</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Judges behind a Veil: The perils of per curiam in a constitutional democracy</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">61(18), May 2. 2026: p.13-16</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The significance of naming conventions in judicial verdicts is explored in the context of per curiam anonymity. By mandating judges to take ownership of their reasoning and applications of the law, the judiciary could reinforce both legitimacy and public trust in the judicial process as a whole.-Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/18/commentary/judges-behind-veil.html
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">408546</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-05-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">61(18), May 2. 2026: p.13-16</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR138865</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-05-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
