<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01102nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">533719</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">533719</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260612b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Shanmugam, K. R. </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">61221</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Do states still pay the price for performance?</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">61(19), May 9, 2026: p.72-78</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">As the devolution shares of better-performing states declined sharply over time, there were expectations of a decisive shift towards efficiency-oriented criteria to strengthen fiscal federalism and enhance state autonomy. However, the Sixteenth Finance Commission largely followed the approach of its predecessor, introducing only incremental changes in the distribution formula. Although it signalled a conceptual shift by acknowledging states&#x2019; contribution to gross domestic product, the adoption of a square root transformation substantially diluted the practical impact of this recognition. &#x2013; Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/sixteenth-finance-commission/do-states-still-pay-price-performance.html
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">408898</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-06-12</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">61(19), May 9, 2026: p.72-78</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR139191</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-06-12</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
