<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01306nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">533720</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">533720</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260612b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mohan, R.  </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">61222</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Sixteenth Finance Commission recommendations : How fiscal imbalances have been looked at</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">61(19), May 9, 2026: p.79-85</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The approach of the Sixteenth Finance Commission in addressing the fiscal imbalances, both vertical and horizontal, is examined in this paper. The Sixteenth Finance Commission, while retaining the 41% share of the divisible pool, has attempted certain changes in the formula for inter se distribution of taxes among states, and has not recommended general-purpose grants, commonly called revenue deficit grants, to the states. The paper analyses the Sixteenth Finance Commission recommendations on tax devolution for the states, the non-recommendation of post-devolution grants, the need for an alternative approach to recommend grants under Article 275, and the inclusion of a road map for fiscal consolidation in the Sixteenth Finance Commission report. &#x2013; Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/sixteenth-finance-commission/sixteenth-finance-commission-recommendations.html\
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly  </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">408899</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-06-12</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">61(19), May 9, 2026: p.79-85</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR139192</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-06-12</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
