<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Sixteenth Finance Commission recommendations : How fiscal imbalances have been looked at</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Mohan, R.</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Economic &amp; Political Weekly</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>61(19), May 9, 2026: p.79-85</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>The approach of the Sixteenth Finance Commission in addressing the fiscal imbalances, both vertical and horizontal, is examined in this paper. The Sixteenth Finance Commission, while retaining the 41% share of the divisible pool, has attempted certain changes in the formula for inter se distribution of taxes among states, and has not recommended general-purpose grants, commonly called revenue deficit grants, to the states. The paper analyses the Sixteenth Finance Commission recommendations on tax devolution for the states, the non-recommendation of post-devolution grants, the need for an alternative approach to recommend grants under Article 275, and the inclusion of a road map for fiscal consolidation in the Sixteenth Finance Commission report. – Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/sixteenth-finance-commission/sixteenth-finance-commission-recommendations.html\
</abstract>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Economic &amp; Political Weekly  </namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">260612</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
