<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01095nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">533723</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">533723</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260612b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Kumar, Sanjay Sharma, N.K. and Hussain, Siraj </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">61228</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">New series of consumer price index: A case of many slips</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">61(20), May 16, 2026: p.14-18</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The recently updated base year of the consumer price index was eagerly awaited by researchers and policymakers. It includes weight updates and improved data from digital and administrative sources. However, several conceptual oversights pervade the new series, such as the lack of essential data for the rural housing index and price imputation for items that became free during the currency of the CPI series. Additionally, failing to address population underestimation in socio-economic surveys necessitates a revision of weights at the state and all-India levels. &#x2013; Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/20/commentary/new-series-consumer-price-index.html
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">408902</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-06-12</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">61(20), May 16, 2026: p.14-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR139195</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-06-12</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
