<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>00843nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">533795</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">533795</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260624b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Dhar, Biswajit  </subfield>
    <subfield code="9">61323</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Failure of MC14 : Deepening WTO&#x2019;s crisis</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">61(23), Jun 6, 2026: p.36-41</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The 14th ministerial conference of the World Trade Organization ended in failure. Its member states failed to agree on a work programme that could have proved that the multilateral trading system is still relevant. India should be disappointed as the WTO members failed to stamp their approval on its programme of public stockholding that supports the public distribution system.- Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/23/perspectives/failure-mc14.html
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">408975</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-06-24</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">61(23), Jun 6, 2026: p.36-41</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR139257</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-06-24</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
