<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>01036nam a22001337a 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">533891</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">533891</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">260713b           ||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Singh, Manoj Kumar and   Anil, Niranjana J.</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">61618</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> IMO&#x2019;s carbon levy and implications for India&#x2019;s tax architecture</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">61(25), Jun 20, 2026: p.27-30</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The International Maritime Organization&#x2019;s proposed global carbon levy marks a significant shift in maritime climate governance and raises important questions for India&#x2019;s taxation framework. This article examines the constitutional and legal issues involved in domesticating the levy, including its classification within India&#x2019;s fiscal architecture and the legislative route required for implementation. It also analyses enforcement challenges, relating to customs administration. &#x2013; Reproduced 

https://www.epw.in/journal/2026/25/commentary/imos-carbon-levy-and-implications-indias-tax.html
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Economic &amp; Political Weekly </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="9">409076</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">IIPA</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2026-07-13</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">61(25), Jun 20, 2026: p.27-30</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">AR139350</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2026-07-13</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">AR</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
