<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Revisiting Gandhian thought for climate justice</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Bag, Sarita and Rana, Nalinikanta</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Third Concept</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>40(473), Jul, 2026: p.32-35</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Gandhian moral principles have long been associated with India’s environmental governance and, more recently the reflection son the global disc souse surrounding climate change. Their relevance to contemporary ideas of climate justice can be understood by examining how Gandhi’s though is articulated within the Indian context. The innovation of Gandhi as a symbol of India’s engagement with climate change and sustainable development must be situated within brooder normative debates about eh scope and trajectory of a Gandhian perspective. Concepts such as casmopliansim and raised justice deprived a viable for MacWorld for reinterpreting Gandhi today, while also razing critical questions that this article seeks to explore. – Reproduced </abstract>
  <relatedItem type="host">
    <name>
      <namePart>Third Concept  </namePart>
    </name>
  </relatedItem>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">260713</recordCreationDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
